Solution Categories

Community Directory

Compare solutions

Benchmark my program

Logo

Nightfall

Nightfall uses machine learning to detect and protect sensitive data across cloud services and applications. It integrates with existing workflows to automate data classification and enforce security policies.

Cost considerations

Cost considerations

Functionality

Functionality

Compatibility

Compatibility

User experience

User experience

Customer support

Customer support

Why these ratings?

Cyberse perspective

Summary by Cyberse

Microsoft Sentinel may be considered a good fit for you due to its powerful capabilities.


Here’s a few tips on how to maximize its capabilities:

We use the following criteria to rate this product’s functionality:

Cost considerations

Nightfall uses simple per-user tiers, and buyers pay a median $23 672 per yearβ€”well below many legacy DLP suites. Extra costs arise mainly for large at-rest data packs or extra endpoints, keeping add-ons modest for most teams. The predictable structure and frequent discounts give finance leaders clear budget visibility and a sound cost-to-risk ratio.

Functionality

Nightfall uses AI to automatically discover and classify sensitive data across major SaaS apps and enforce DLP actions. Its automated email encryption adds another layer of protection, yet the documentation shows no full key-lifecycle management or dedicated user behavior analytics, placing functionality just below the top tier

Compatibility

Nightfall offers plug-and-play connectors for major SaaS services and cloud storage like Slack, GitHub, AWS S3, and Google Drive, and forwards findings to Splunk or other SIEMs through syslog or JSON webhooks. Scanning databases such as Snowflake is supported, and on-prem data can be protected via the public REST API with modest scripting. Because almost all mainstream environments connect natively and only a few require light customization, Compatibility scores 4

User experience

Nightfall offers an intuitive dashboard with guided policy templates and alerts that users say are easy to set up and review, keeping the learning curve short. Available information does not mention visual data-flow maps or risk heatmaps, so the user experience aligns with a solid level 4 rather than the rubric’s highest tier.

Customer support

Support is offered via email, phone, live chat and an online FAQ but public materials do not promise 24Γ—7 coverage. Most users describe helpful, knowledgeable agents, yet several reviews note tickets sitting for days, so responsiveness is solid but not consistently prompt. No clear evidence of regular content update cycles or expert advisory services keeps the score at mid-tier.