SecurityScorecard
SecurityScorecard
SecurityScorecard provides security ratings and risk assessments to help organizations evaluate the cybersecurity posture of their external partners. It uses data from multiple sources to generate risk scores and identify potential vulnerabilities in third-party networks.
SecurityScorecard provides security ratings and risk assessments to help organizations evaluate the cybersecurity posture of their external partners. It uses data from multiple sources to generate risk scores and identify potential vulnerabilities in third-party networks.
Cost considerations
Functionality
Compatibility
User experience
Customer support
Why these ratings?
Cyberse perspective
Solution details
Product features
Technology risk management
Cybersecurity risk management
Subcategory
Assessment Management Platforms
Vendor Risk Scoring
Integrations
Security automation
Cloud ecosystem partners
Amazon Web Services
Microsoft Azure Cloud
Google Cloud Platform
Integrations
Third party risk management
Pricing
Free trial available
Product features
Risk scoring
Customizable assessments and questionnaires
Vendor management
Threat intelligence
Services support
In-house services
Managed services
Deployment
Cloud-native
Cloud-hosted
Market segment
Small business
Enterprise
Midmarket
We use the following criteria to evaluate this product:
Cost considerations
SecurityScorecard starts around $16.5k for five vendors and then adds roughly $1.5–2k per additional vendor while questionnaires sit in a separate Atlas module that costs extra. The vendor offers only a free self-rating tier; full TPRM pricing is hidden behind sales quotes, so budgeting is uncertain. Higher entry fees, per-vendor surcharges, and opaque packaging make overall cost above the market norm.
Cost considerations
SecurityScorecard starts around $16.5k for five vendors and then adds roughly $1.5–2k per additional vendor while questionnaires sit in a separate Atlas module that costs extra. The vendor offers only a free self-rating tier; full TPRM pricing is hidden behind sales quotes, so budgeting is uncertain. Higher entry fees, per-vendor surcharges, and opaque packaging make overall cost above the market norm.
Functionality
SecurityScorecard automatically discovers vendors and keeps an up-to-date inventory. AI analyses questionnaire responses and scores them quickly, while continuous external scanning updates ratings daily and flags issues. Built-in dashboards surface risk trends and the workflow assigns remediation tasks to vendors for tracked resolution.
Functionality
SecurityScorecard automatically discovers vendors and keeps an up-to-date inventory. AI analyses questionnaire responses and scores them quickly, while continuous external scanning updates ratings daily and flags issues. Built-in dashboards surface risk trends and the workflow assigns remediation tasks to vendors for tracked resolution.
Compatibility
SecurityScorecard offers out-of-the-box connectors to ServiceNow and Archer GRC systems. Native apps send continuous ratings into Splunk SIEM and surface supplier risk inside Coupa procurement. SAML-based SSO and an open REST API are available, but ratings update daily rather than near-real-time, so the score is 4 instead of 5.
Compatibility
SecurityScorecard offers out-of-the-box connectors to ServiceNow and Archer GRC systems. Native apps send continuous ratings into Splunk SIEM and surface supplier risk inside Coupa procurement. SAML-based SSO and an open REST API are available, but ratings update daily rather than near-real-time, so the score is 4 instead of 5.
User experience
Users on review sites describe the interface as “easy to use,” with dashboards that non-technical teams and vendors navigate quickly. A few reviewers mention tasks like removing misattributed domains or interpreting busy charts, so admins face a small learning curve. These factors keep usability high but short of the friction-free experience that would merit a 5.
User experience
Users on review sites describe the interface as “easy to use,” with dashboards that non-technical teams and vendors navigate quickly. A few reviewers mention tasks like removing misattributed domains or interpreting busy charts, so admins face a small learning curve. These factors keep usability high but short of the friction-free experience that would merit a 5.
Customer support
SecurityScorecard runs a ticket-based support team that answers requests 8 a.m.–5 p.m. ET on weekdays. The help center offers a searchable knowledge base and suggests articles while you fill a ticket, giving quick self-service guidance. Reviews show enterprise clients get timely responses but lower tiers wait longer, so support is dependable yet falls short of 24×7 options some rivals provide.
Customer support
SecurityScorecard runs a ticket-based support team that answers requests 8 a.m.–5 p.m. ET on weekdays. The help center offers a searchable knowledge base and suggests articles while you fill a ticket, giving quick self-service guidance. Reviews show enterprise clients get timely responses but lower tiers wait longer, so support is dependable yet falls short of 24×7 options some rivals provide.