SecurityScorecard
SecurityScorecard
Updated August 20, 2025
Updated August 20, 2025
SecurityScorecard provides security ratings and risk assessments to help organizations evaluate the cybersecurity posture of their external partners. It uses data from multiple sources to generate risk scores and identify potential vulnerabilities in third-party networks.
SecurityScorecard provides security ratings and risk assessments to help organizations evaluate the cybersecurity posture of their external partners. It uses data from multiple sources to generate risk scores and identify potential vulnerabilities in third-party networks.
Assessment Management Platforms
Vendor Risk Scoring
Cost considerations
Cost considerations
Functionality
Functionality
Compatibility
Compatibility
User experience
User experience
Customer support
Customer support
Why these ratings?
Cyberse perspective
Cyberse perspective
Solution details
Target industry
Technology
Public sector
Industrials
Healthcare
Retail
Manufacturing
Financial services
Supported frameworks
PCI
NIST CSF/800-53
CCPA
GDPR
HIPAA
ISO 27001/27002
Services support
In-house services
Managed services
Product features
Technology risk management
Cybersecurity risk management
Product features
Risk scoring
Customizable assessments and questionnaires
Vendor management
Threat intelligence
Pricing
Free trial available
Market segment
Small business
Enterprise
Midmarket
Key features
API access
Platform solution
Integrations
Security automation
Integrations
Third party risk management
Ratings
Cost considerations
SecurityScorecard starts around $16.5k for five vendors and then adds roughly $1.5–2k per additional vendor while questionnaires sit in a separate Atlas module that costs extra. The vendor offers only a free self-rating tier; full TPRM pricing is hidden behind sales quotes, so budgeting is uncertain. Higher entry fees, per-vendor surcharges, and opaque packaging make overall cost above the market norm.
Cost considerations
SecurityScorecard starts around $16.5k for five vendors and then adds roughly $1.5–2k per additional vendor while questionnaires sit in a separate Atlas module that costs extra. The vendor offers only a free self-rating tier; full TPRM pricing is hidden behind sales quotes, so budgeting is uncertain. Higher entry fees, per-vendor surcharges, and opaque packaging make overall cost above the market norm.
Vendors assessed/year
Functionality
SecurityScorecard automatically discovers vendors and keeps an up-to-date inventory. AI analyses questionnaire responses and scores them quickly, while continuous external scanning updates ratings daily and flags issues. Built-in dashboards surface risk trends and the workflow assigns remediation tasks to vendors for tracked resolution.
Functionality
SecurityScorecard automatically discovers vendors and keeps an up-to-date inventory. AI analyses questionnaire responses and scores them quickly, while continuous external scanning updates ratings daily and flags issues. Built-in dashboards surface risk trends and the workflow assigns remediation tasks to vendors for tracked resolution.
Compatibility
SecurityScorecard offers out-of-the-box connectors to ServiceNow and Archer GRC systems. Native apps send continuous ratings into Splunk SIEM and surface supplier risk inside Coupa procurement. SAML-based SSO and an open REST API are available, but ratings update daily rather than near-real-time, so the score is 4 instead of 5.
Compatibility
SecurityScorecard offers out-of-the-box connectors to ServiceNow and Archer GRC systems. Native apps send continuous ratings into Splunk SIEM and surface supplier risk inside Coupa procurement. SAML-based SSO and an open REST API are available, but ratings update daily rather than near-real-time, so the score is 4 instead of 5.
User experience
Users on review sites describe the interface as “easy to use,” with dashboards that non-technical teams and vendors navigate quickly. A few reviewers mention tasks like removing misattributed domains or interpreting busy charts, so admins face a small learning curve. These factors keep usability high but short of the friction-free experience that would merit a 5.
User experience
Users on review sites describe the interface as “easy to use,” with dashboards that non-technical teams and vendors navigate quickly. A few reviewers mention tasks like removing misattributed domains or interpreting busy charts, so admins face a small learning curve. These factors keep usability high but short of the friction-free experience that would merit a 5.
Customer support
SecurityScorecard runs a ticket-based support team that answers requests 8 a.m.–5 p.m. ET on weekdays. The help center offers a searchable knowledge base and suggests articles while you fill a ticket, giving quick self-service guidance. Reviews show enterprise clients get timely responses but lower tiers wait longer, so support is dependable yet falls short of 24×7 options some rivals provide.
Customer support
SecurityScorecard runs a ticket-based support team that answers requests 8 a.m.–5 p.m. ET on weekdays. The help center offers a searchable knowledge base and suggests articles while you fill a ticket, giving quick self-service guidance. Reviews show enterprise clients get timely responses but lower tiers wait longer, so support is dependable yet falls short of 24×7 options some rivals provide.
Explore similar solutions
Explore similar solutions
Explore other categories
Explore other categories
Cyberse provides free tools for cybersecurity buyers to assess needs, research solutions, and compare products.
Cyberse provides free tools for cybersecurity buyers to assess needs, research solutions, and compare products.
Subscribe
