Solution Logo

SecurityScorecard

SecurityScorecard

Updated August 20, 2025

Updated August 20, 2025

SecurityScorecard provides security ratings and risk assessments to help organizations evaluate the cybersecurity posture of their external partners. It uses data from multiple sources to generate risk scores and identify potential vulnerabilities in third-party networks.

SecurityScorecard provides security ratings and risk assessments to help organizations evaluate the cybersecurity posture of their external partners. It uses data from multiple sources to generate risk scores and identify potential vulnerabilities in third-party networks.

Vendor Risk Scoring

Link copied!

Compare products

Cost considerations

Cost considerations

Functionality

Functionality

Compatibility

Compatibility

User experience

User experience

Customer support

Customer support

Why these ratings?

Cyberse perspective

Cyberse perspective

Solution details

Target industry

Technology

Industrials

Manufacturing

Supported frameworks

PCI

COBIT

GDPR

HIPAA

ISO 27001

NIST CSF

Services support

In-house services

Third party integrators

Managed services

Product features

Cybersecurity risk management

Enterprise risk management

Product features

Risk scoring

Vendor management

Threat intelligence

Pricing

Free trial available

Market segment

Enterprise

Midmarket

Key features

Platform solution

Integrations

Security automation

Governance Risk and Compliance

Integrations

Third party risk management

Ratings

Cost considerations

SecurityScorecard starts around $16.5k for five vendors and then adds roughly $1.5–2k per additional vendor while questionnaires sit in a separate Atlas module that costs extra. The vendor offers only a free self-rating tier; full TPRM pricing is hidden behind sales quotes, so budgeting is uncertain. Higher entry fees, per-vendor surcharges, and opaque packaging make overall cost above the market norm.

Cost considerations

SecurityScorecard starts around $16.5k for five vendors and then adds roughly $1.5–2k per additional vendor while questionnaires sit in a separate Atlas module that costs extra. The vendor offers only a free self-rating tier; full TPRM pricing is hidden behind sales quotes, so budgeting is uncertain. Higher entry fees, per-vendor surcharges, and opaque packaging make overall cost above the market norm.

Custom quote

Functionality

SecurityScorecard automatically discovers vendors and keeps an up-to-date inventory. AI analyses questionnaire responses and scores them quickly, while continuous external scanning updates ratings daily and flags issues. Built-in dashboards surface risk trends and the workflow assigns remediation tasks to vendors for tracked resolution.

Functionality

SecurityScorecard automatically discovers vendors and keeps an up-to-date inventory. AI analyses questionnaire responses and scores them quickly, while continuous external scanning updates ratings daily and flags issues. Built-in dashboards surface risk trends and the workflow assigns remediation tasks to vendors for tracked resolution.

Compatibility

SecurityScorecard offers out-of-the-box connectors to ServiceNow and Archer GRC systems. Native apps send continuous ratings into Splunk SIEM and surface supplier risk inside Coupa procurement. SAML-based SSO and an open REST API are available, but ratings update daily rather than near-real-time, so the score is 4 instead of 5.

Compatibility

SecurityScorecard offers out-of-the-box connectors to ServiceNow and Archer GRC systems. Native apps send continuous ratings into Splunk SIEM and surface supplier risk inside Coupa procurement. SAML-based SSO and an open REST API are available, but ratings update daily rather than near-real-time, so the score is 4 instead of 5.

User experience

Users on review sites describe the interface as “easy to use,” with dashboards that non-technical teams and vendors navigate quickly. A few reviewers mention tasks like removing misattributed domains or interpreting busy charts, so admins face a small learning curve. These factors keep usability high but short of the friction-free experience that would merit a 5.

User experience

Users on review sites describe the interface as “easy to use,” with dashboards that non-technical teams and vendors navigate quickly. A few reviewers mention tasks like removing misattributed domains or interpreting busy charts, so admins face a small learning curve. These factors keep usability high but short of the friction-free experience that would merit a 5.

Customer support

SecurityScorecard runs a ticket-based support team that answers requests 8 a.m.–5 p.m. ET on weekdays. The help center offers a searchable knowledge base and suggests articles while you fill a ticket, giving quick self-service guidance. Reviews show enterprise clients get timely responses but lower tiers wait longer, so support is dependable yet falls short of 24×7 options some rivals provide.

Customer support

SecurityScorecard runs a ticket-based support team that answers requests 8 a.m.–5 p.m. ET on weekdays. The help center offers a searchable knowledge base and suggests articles while you fill a ticket, giving quick self-service guidance. Reviews show enterprise clients get timely responses but lower tiers wait longer, so support is dependable yet falls short of 24×7 options some rivals provide.

Cyberse provides free tools for cybersecurity buyers to assess needs, research solutions, and compare products.

Cyberse provides free tools for cybersecurity buyers to assess needs, research solutions, and compare products.

Subscribe